No. 20-1744
Google, Inc., et al. v. John Doe, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure federal-preemption labor-relations national-labor-relations-act nlra-jurisdiction penalties preemption state-law-claims statutory-preemption
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA FirstAmendment LaborRelations
Arbitration ERISA FirstAmendment LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the National Labor Relations Act preempts a state-law claim for penalties based on the same conduct that formed the basis of relief under the NLRA
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Where plaintiff has sought and obtained relief under the National Labor Relations Act, does the Act preempt plaintiff’s state-law claim for penalties for the same conduct?
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-17
Reply of petitioners Google, Inc., et al. filed.
2021-09-08
Brief of respondents John Doe, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-07-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 8, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-07-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 9, 2021 to September 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-08
Response Requested. (Due August 9, 2021)
2021-06-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent John Doe, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 16, 2021)
Attorneys
Google, Inc., et al.
Paul William Cane Jr. — Paul Hastings LLP, Petitioner
Paul William Cane Jr. — Paul Hastings LLP, Petitioner
John Doe, et al.
Christopher D. Baker — Baker Curtis & Schwartz, P.C., Respondent
Christopher D. Baker — Baker Curtis & Schwartz, P.C., Respondent