No. 20-7402
Sylas Glenn Brownridge v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-924(c)(3)(A) categorical-approach crime-of-violence force-clause hobbs-act physical-force statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 is a crime of violence under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 isa crime of violence under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), where the offense encompasses threats of future harm to intangible property and economic interests, and thus does not categorically require the use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force? i Statement of
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2021)
Attorneys
Sylas Glenn Brownridge
Brianna Fuller Mircheff — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Brianna Fuller Mircheff — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent