No. 20-7412

Anthony W. Gardner v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-statutes force-clause hobbs-act physical-force property-crimes statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 is a crime of violence under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 isa crime of violence under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), where the offense encompasses threats of harm to intangible property and economic interests, and thus does not categorically require the use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force? i Statement of

Docket Entries

2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Anthony W. Gardner
Brianna Fuller MircheffOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Brianna Fuller MircheffOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent