Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a COVID vaccine mandate that provides no religious exemption while allowing medical exemptions violates the Free Exercise Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Using its emergency regulatory powers, New York has imposed a COVID vaccine mandate on healthcare workers, but provided no religious exemption. Workers who are unvaccinated for religious reasons are excluded from the workplace. By contrast, healthcare workers remaining unvaccinated for medical reasons are permitted to continue in-person healthcare work— often in the same facilities, doing the same jobs, and carrying the same claimed risk as the terminated religious objectors. New York even allows vaccinated workers with active and symptomatic infections to continue working, but not healthy religious objectors. New York’s approach deviates from virtually every other state and the federal government, which continue to allow unvaccinated religious objectors to provide in-person healthcare. The questions presented are: 1. Whether an administrative rule that targets and forbids religious conduct, while permitting otherwise identical secular conduct, is permissible under the Free Exercise Clause. 2. Whether Employment Division v. Smith should be overruled.
Docket Entries
2022-06-30
Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito and Justice Gorsuch join, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-1143_3f14.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/16/2022.
2022-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
2022-05-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-04-05
Reply of petitioners Dr. A., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-04-05
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.
2022-04-01
Brief of respondents Kathy Hochul, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-03-18
Brief amici curiae of Former EEOC Employees and Title VII Religious Accommodation Experts filed.
2022-03-18
Brief amicus curiae of Thomas More Law Center filed.
2022-03-18
Brief amicus curiae of Protect The First Foundation filed.
2022-03-18
Brief amicus curiae of Catholic Medical Association filed.
2022-03-18
Brief amicus curiae of The Robertson Center for Constitutional Law filed.
2022-03-18
Brief amici curiae of United States Senators Marco Rubio, et al. filed.
2022-03-18
Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.
2022-03-17
Brief amici curiae of Drs. Jay Bhattacharya and R. Scott French filed.
2022-03-17
Brief amicus curiae of First Liberty Institute filed.
2022-03-16
Brief amicus curiae of Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed.
2022-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part, and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2022.
2022-03-04
Response to motion to extend the time to file a response from petitioner Dr. A., et al. filed.
2022-03-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 18, 2022 to April 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2022)
2021-12-13
Application (21A145) denied by the Court. Justice Thomas would grant the application. Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Alito joins, dissenting from the denial of application for injunctive relief. (Detached <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a145_gfbi.pdf'>Opinion</a>)
2021-12-13
Application (21A145) referred to the Court.
2021-11-23
Letter of applicants Dr. A., et al. filed.
2021-11-18
Motion for leave to file amicus brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by John Doe 1.
2021-11-17
Reply of applicants Dr. A., et al. filed.
2021-11-16
Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Sharon Fast Gustafson, et al.
2021-11-16
Response to application from respondents Kathy Hochul, et al. filed.
2021-11-12
Application (21A145) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2021-11-12
Response to application (21A145) requested by Justice Sotomayor, due Tuesday, November 16, by 4 p.m.
Attorneys
Catholic Medical Association
Drs. Jay Bhattacharya and R. Scott French
Former EEOC Employees and Title VII Religious Accommodation Experts
Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty
New Civil Liberties Alliance
Protect The First Foundation
The Robertson Center for Constitutional Law
U.S. Senators Marco Rubio, John Barrasso, Mike Braun, Kevin Cramer, Ted Cruz, John Hoeven, Cindy Hyde-Smith, James Lankford, Mike Lee, Cynthia Lummis, and Rick Scott