Whether Respondent School District of Philadelphia discharged appellant without due process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Respondent School District of Philadelphia, on August 25, 1992, discharged appellant Arthur O. Armstrong, without just cause, without a hearing, without due — process of law in violation of Article B-VIII -grievance Procedure of the Collective Bargaining Agreement without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 2. | Whether Respondent School District of Philadelphia, on November 18, 1994, transgressed the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, when respondent deprived appellant of property , when appellee deprived appellant of reinstatement of his teaching position without due process of law in violation of the collective bargaining agreement and the Constitution of the United States. , ii Proceedings and Related Cases All parties appear in the caption of the case are on the cover page RELATED CASES Armstrong v. City of Philadelphia, Pa, et al, No. 2-99-cv-00825-PSD. United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsylvania, On November 19, 2021, appellant seeks leave. to appeal a district court order entered on September 28, 1999. Armstrong v. City of Philadelphia, Pa, et al, No. 21-8050. United States Court of Appeals For the Third Circuit. Judgment entered on December 10, 2021. There is no .parent or publicly held company owning 10% or more of corporate stock.__ TABLE OF CONTENT Questions Presented Disclosure Statement Table of CONtENE Opinion below Jurisdiction statement