Who has responsibility to inform indigent pro se complainant of right to counsel in Title VII action?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED In a Title VII action between an indigent pro se complainant and private sector employer, who, if anyone, has the responsibility of informing the complainant of her statutory right to apply for an appointment of counsel to represent her in ensuing litigation in a federal district court? Are indigent pro se Plaintiffs’ Title VII rights and remedies abrogated after Defendant's second summary judgment motion is granted without a claim of newly discovered evidence? After more than four years of litigation in a Title VIl sex discrimination and retaliation claim, did Defendant's second summary judgment motion promptly raise an EEOC exhaustion-related | defense to bar Plaintiff's evidence and continuing violation and hostile environment claims and } justify dismissal of Plaintiff's lawsuit? | | | | | | | |! | | |