No. 22-165

Samuel M. Howard v. Office of the Special Deputy Receiver, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: amendment civil-procedure civil-rights discrimination due-process eeoc-filing employment judicial-discretion standing title-vii
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Court and Magistrate Judge did not consider all of the brief, filing, company witnesses, and business location and area

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the District Court and Magistrate Judge did not consider all of the brief, filing, company witnesses, and business location and area. And my evidence was submitted to both courts. 2. Whether the remedial purposes of Title VII protections will be severely limited, but I filed with EEOC (TCHR). The Department of Insurance, The Division of Worker’s Compensation, Danna Campbell, MD Texas State Senator District 25, Consumer Services ; Department of Financial Services. Service request No. 1-1014881945, Governor Michael L. Parson, State of Missouri—Division of Consumer Affairs, Senator Jeff Merkley, Washington DC, The President of the United States Joe Biden Washington DC. And Lawyer Carl Hays of Dallas TX. 8. Whether it is an abuse of discretion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure’s liberal pleading amendment provision to deny a litigant leave to amend to add a count for on-the-job injury discrimination to a Title VII notice of the claims. ii , _

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-22
Waiver of right of respondent Office of the Special Duty Receiver, et al. to respond filed.
2022-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 22, 2022)

Attorneys

Office of the Special Duty Receiver, et al.
Reid T. HudginsHartline Barger, LLP, Respondent
Samuel M. Howard
Samuel M. Howard — Petitioner