Did the District court and the Court of Appeal erred in denying the Petitioner her legal rights within her legal capacity from the facts in her case and prevented her from whistleblowing which was ruled on and based on the U.S. Constitution which prohibits this kind of behavior?

No question identified. : : investigation which lasted 2 years, and isn't withholding discovery material a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1509?? ; 2. The standard of review for error #2 This court has already ruled on cases relating to sexual harassment, wrongful termination, retaliation, and age discrimination and has tandmark cases and from them created rules and laws which has been implemented to prevent these acts in the future. QUESTION: Did the District court and the Court of Appeal erred in denying the Petitioner her legal rights within her legal capacity from the facts in her case and prevented her from whistleblowing which was ruled on and based on the U.S. Constitution which prohibits this kind of behavior? —. 3. The standard of review for error #3 Isn"t it the "Rights and Responsibility” of any person within the U.S. and its territories, under the Ist Ammendment for freedom of speech to make a complaint and be protected, and under the 14th Ammendment for — due process when their rights were violated under the taw of the U.S. Constitution?