No. 23-5242
Rebecca Wu v. Public Employment Relations Board, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment arbitrary-classification constitutional-challenge constitutional-law employee-classification employee-misclassification equal-protection labor-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Antitrust DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Antitrust DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the interpretation of a statute that creates an arbitrary classification unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW Is it unconstitutional to have an interpretation of a statute that creates an Arbitrary classification in violation of the constitution of the 14th Amendment? When an employee is misclassified, claims to be so, and in Wu case recognized by the local union as misclassified (see
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent Respondent Public Employment Relations Board to respond filed.
2023-08-22
Waiver of right of respondent TWIN RIVERS UNITED EDUCATORS, CTA/NEA, Real Party in Interest to respond filed.
2023-07-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Respondent Public Employment Relations Board
TWIN RIVERS UNITED EDUCATORS, CTA/NEA, Real Party in Interest