No. 23-561

Katherine Muslow, et al. v. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Board of Supervisors, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: comparator-requirement employment-discrimination equal-pay-act gender-discrimination pay-discrimination retaliation sex-discrimination title-vii wage-disparity
Key Terms:
Environmental Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the EPA protect employees who are paid less money for positions requiring more skill, effort, or responsibility than those held by employees of the opposite sex?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is: (1) Does the EPA protect employees who are paid less money for positions requiring more skill, effort, or responsibility than those held by employees of the opposite sex—a question the Federal Regulations and other Circuits have answered affirmatively, but the Fifth Circuit answered negatively here? ii Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes it unlawful for an employer “to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s ... sex[.]” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). The Act does not set out any specific evidentiary burdens that must be met, id., and this Court has made clear that Title VII protects employees in unique positions within an organization. Washington Cnty. v. Gunther, 452 U.S. 161, 178-179 (1981). The Fifth Circuit nevertheless found Petitioners could not establish a prima facie Title VII pay-discrimination case because, as the only general counsel and staff attorney at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans, they could not satisfy the Fifth Circuit’s requirement of a “nearly identical” comparator. The second question presented is: (2) Does the Fifth Circuit’s requirement of a “nearly identical” comparator to establish a prima facie pay-discrimination case improperly circumscribe Title VII’s plain language and conflict with the holdings of this Court and other Circuits imposing no comparator requirement at all, much less a “nearly identical” one? ili PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS BELOW Petitioners are Katherine Muslow and Meredith Cunningham, who were in the Fifth Circuit. Respondents are Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Board of Supervisors; and Larry Hollier. Other in the Fifth Circuit were Thomas Skinner, John Harman, and Carlton Jones III (also known as Trey Jones).

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Larry Hollier to respond filed.
2023-12-07
Waiver of right of respondents Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Board of Supervisors, et al. to respond filed.
2023-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2023)

Attorneys

Katherine Muslow, et al.
Kelli Benham BillsTillotson Johnson & Patton, Petitioner
Kelli Benham BillsTillotson Johnson & Patton, Petitioner
Larry Hollier
Craig R. WatsonBlue Williams, L.L.C., Respondent
Craig R. WatsonBlue Williams, L.L.C., Respondent
Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Board of Supervisors, et al.
M. Nan AlessandraPhelps, Dunbar, et al, Respondent
M. Nan AlessandraPhelps, Dunbar, et al, Respondent