Upfront access to order tools and materials

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The upfront access to order tools and materials for the jobs Why did Mr. Fulton and Puckett tried to block the upfront access to order tools and supplies for the jobs for a full 03 months 12/16/16 — 03/16/17 instead of 24 to 72 hours. | had to purchase the tools from the local stores and paid by myself. (I had the attached the detailed statements) | was met and spoke with Fulton and Puckett in person regarding the upfront access for a several times. But they were still blocked it. On 03/16/17. | had to send an email to the third line manager (Mrs. Lindgren) for help After, my email had reached to Mrs. Lindgren. Then, Fulton sent an email to Puckett and stated that “Andrew should not have access to order tools, only minor materials “ while other (NonAsian) employees ordered tools and the materials without restrictions Fulton had told me that ! did not follow the command chains. It's violated the Code of Business. Fulton knew that the employees have the right to skip level management. If | didn’t contact Mrs. Lindgren. | didn’t know when | could be accessed the upfront The Non-Asian employees (my co-workers) were allowed to order the high cost of the fiber splicing machine with the advanced features and with a multiple fiber connections The Asian employee (Andrew Nguyen) had to wait 18 months (04/2017 -10/01/18) and Fulton was asked Puckett to order for a cheap model with a single fiber connection Why did Puckett had taken Andrew's ordered packages into Puckett's office and short the items on the orders and left other employees’ ordered packages in the stock room On the testing equipment (called as a sidekick) The most employees (Non-Asian) had received the sidekick with the newer version (blue color) and Puckett assigned the older version (grey color) for 06 times with the mailfunctional issues and the tester was out of date for re-calibrate I got the problems to order tools such as: The drill driver, materials, the probe to check the dial tone and other employees had no problems with Puckett Would you please refer to the Motion for Submitting the Statements to support for the Petitioner for a Writ of Certiorari for the detailed statements regarding the 06 sidekick that assigned to me. | had my coworkers stopped by and verified that my sidekicks did not working right MISMATCHED COMMUNICATIONS On 10/04/18. | had contacted and reported to the Hotline Department regarding the discrimination actions against Fulton and Puckett with case No: 1810ATT10053 . ‘ Page: 10 On 11/14/18. At the meeting with Puckett had Michael Grey was the witness. Andrew had said “ Hotline be coming “. Puckett had blamed that Andrew said “ your time is coming “ and Puckett had filed the report to Access Protection Dept Grey had stated that Andrew said “ you will get what is coming “. Then Puckett and Grey was adding more negative statements and submitted to the AP On 11/26/18. The Access Protection's investigator Alisa Allen ran a background check on Andrew Nguyen based on the Allegation of Verbal Threat. Zero Results from the background check On 12/14/18. Alisa Allen ran another extensive background check and Zero Results, also On 01/22/19. Alisa Allen had asked Tracy Brewer (CWA Union steward). If he heard Mr. Nguyen say you are going to get what is coming to you or something close to that comment. Mr. Brewer said no he did not Please refer to Case: 3:21-cv-0913-C, Doc. 18, Filed 07/15/22, Page 9 of 161, Page ID 141 for the clarification for the mismatched communications by Puckett and Grey On 03/14/19. The Texas Workforce Commission had made the Determination on the unemployment benefits with the Reason as below: Our investigation found that your employer fired you for a reason that was not misconduct connected with the work. We will charge your former employer's account if we pay you benefits The EEOC cases: The Appellee had tried to be claimed that the EEOC charge had filed outside of 300 day-period On 10/04/18. The Hotline case