Whether the court erred in upholding the ruling that there was no genuine issue of material fact with regard to Mr. Katz's claims of DOJ violations of the Rehabilitation Act and potential retaliation?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the court erred in upholding the ruling that there was no genuine issue of material fact with regard to Mr. Katz’s claim that the DOJ violated the reasonable accommodation requirement of the Rehabilitation Act? : 2. Whether the court erred in upholding the ruling that there was no genuine issue of material ‘ fact with regard to Mr. Katz’s claim that the DOJ retaliated against Mr. Katz after he made complaints to the EEOC and the DOJ OIG?