No. 24-661

Richard Rynn v. First Transit Incorporated, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: due-process eeoc-protection employer-responsibility labor-dispute no-fear-act workplace-discrimination
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-05-15 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an employer is responsible for an injunction in a labor dispute involving employee actions, workplace discrimination, and potential due process violations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is employer responsible for injunction based on labor dispute for actions of employees at the workplace under direction of employer and non-disclosure? 2. Is it a violation of due process for court to deny filing further briefs based on critical new evidence and fraud? 3. Ave employees protected by the EEOC, labor laws and No FEAR. Act, P.L. 107-174 for discrimination, at the workplace and rights to discloser of work place accusations? PARTIES TO PROCEEDING Defendant First Transit

Docket Entries

2025-05-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-03-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2025-02-24
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2025.
2025-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent First Transit, Inc. to respond filed.
2024-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 21, 2025)
2024-07-11
Application (24A17) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 19, 2024.
2024-07-02
Application (24A17) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 21, 2024 to September 19, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

First Transit, Inc.
Kimberly M. ShappleyLittler Mesndelson, P.C., Respondent
Richard Rynn
Richard Rynn — Petitioner