| 25-820 |
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. WhereverTV, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2026-01-12 |
Pending |
appellate-procedure circuit-split jurisdictional-issue party-presentation sua-sponte waiver |
Whether a court of appeals may override the principle of party presentation by deciding sua sponte a non jurisdictional issue that a party deliberatel… |
| 24-1137 |
NexStep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2025-05-06 |
Denied |
doctrine-of-equivalents expert-testimony federal-circuit jury-verdict patent-infringement patent-law |
Whether a patentee must in every case present 'particularized testimony and linking argument' to establish infringement under the doctrine of equivale… |
| 24A847 |
NexStep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2025-03-04 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 24-365 |
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Charles Ramsey |
California |
2024-10-01 |
Denied |
arbitration-agreement consumer-legal-remedies-act federal-arbitration-act preemption public-injunctive-relief unfair-competition-law |
Whether the FAA preempts California's McGill rule that renders standard arbitration agreements unenforceable when a consumer-plaintiff seeks to enjoin… |
| 23A1102 |
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Charles Ramsey |
California |
2024-06-11 |
Presumed Complete |
arbitration-agreement consumer-protection federal-arbitration-act mcgill-rule ninth-circuit public-injunctive-relief |
Whether California's McGill rule impermissibly disfavors arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act by rendering standard bilateral arbitration agr… |
| 23-691 |
Samuel Ghee v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-12-27 |
Denied |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-immunity official-liability standing stare-decisis state-law willful-misconduct |
Whether qualified or judicial immunity immunizes willful misconduct and failure to perform duties |
| 20-8145 |
Tamara Rouhi v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-05-26 |
Denied |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process federal-courts federal-procedure injustice judicial-review motion-to-dismiss standing |
There has been no redress of my grievance |
| 20-1220 |
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Promptu Systems Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-03-03 |
Denied |
administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause appointments-clause-interpretation constitutional-law inferior-officers judicial-review officer-status principal-officers separation-of-powers |
Whether administrative patent judges are 'principal' or 'inferior' Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause |
| 20-414 |
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-30 |
Denied |
administrative-law administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause civil-procedure constitutional-interpretation due-process executive-officers patent separation-of-powers tenure-protections |
Whether administrative patent judges are principal or inferior officers under the Appointments Clause |
| 20-273 |
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Rovi Guides, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-09-02 |
Dismissed |
administrative-law administrative-patent-judges agency-adjudication appointments-clause constitutional-interpretation inferior-officers judicial-review patent-judges principal-officers separation-of-powers united-states-patent-and-trademark-office |
Whether administrative patent judges are principal or inferior officers under the Appointments Clause |
| 20-92 |
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Promptu Systems Corporation, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-07-29 |
Denied |
administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause appointments-clause-interpretation constitutional-law inferior-officers officer-status principal-officers separation-of-powers |
Whether administrative patent judges are 'principal' or 'inferior' Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause |
| 18-124 |
Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2018-07-27 |
Denied |
35-usc-101 abstract-idea factual-questions innovation-specificity motion-to-dismiss patent-claims patent-eligibility patent-eligibility-under-35-usc-101 patent-specification section-101 specificity-requirement technological-architecture |
Innovative-technological-architecture-for-online-media-streaming |