Search

6 results for “Edward Jones”

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Tags Question Presented
23-7166 Charles Edward Jones v. United States Eleventh Circuit 2024-04-09 GVR constitutional-challenge criminal-law habeas-corpus recidivism recidivist-enhancement residual-clause retroactivity second-successive-motion sentencing three-strikes-statute vagueness Whether a constitutional challenge to 18 U.S.C. §3559(c)'s residual clause predicated on Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), is cognizable …
23A789 Charles Edward Jones v. United States Eleventh Circuit 2024-02-27 Presumed Complete §2255-motion constitutional-retroactivity jurisdictional-limitation mandatory-life-sentence residual-clause successive-habeas Whether a federal appellate court lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §2255(h)(2) to review a successive habeas motion challenging a mandatory life sen…
22-5347 In Re Charles Edward Jones, Sr. 2022-08-15 Denied administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process standing statutory-interpretation Whether the constitutional and statutory provisions at issue were properly applied by the lower court
20-6125 Edward Jones v. William Aaron Traylor, et al. Eighth Circuit 2020-10-23 Denied administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection standing Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims
20-6126 Edward Jones v. Candace Edward, et al. Eighth Circuit 2020-10-23 Denied 35-usc-101 civil-procedure due-process patent standing takings Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in its interpretation and application of 35 U.S.C. § 101 in this case
19-5042 Charles Edward Jones, Sr. v. Josephine T. Griffin, Circuit Clerk, Chicot County, et al. Eighth Circuit 2019-07-02 Denied access-to-court access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process equal-protection federal-rules-of-civil-procedure first-amendment fourteenth-amendment legal-remedy petition-filing standing Whether the district court erred in denying petitioner's claim of denying access to the court and equal protection of law and due process under the Fo…