Search

8 results for “J. S.”

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Tags Question Presented
25-5882 Michael Broomer v. Brian Emig, Warden, et al. Third Circuit 2025-10-15 Denied None 4Acxb<?o,5- C6cy<->5 (/-S. C -/£]ypA jIs-Az/'g, 5 4c 4e 5 ~4hc 4of i/ncanS'/n^t'o^ )Ke ro^ j4<'L-/ tQz, 4,'Az-en Should A>tz deprived df prices; 5ihv…
24-7482 Raphael Stein, Acting on Behalf of His Minor Children J. S., Z. N., and A. Z. v. Adeena Kohn Second Circuit 2025-06-24 Denied child-abduction custody-rights habitual-residence hague-convention international-law one-year-exception Whether an actual breach of custody rights must occur to establish wrongful retention under the Hague Convention, or if mere notice of an intended fut…
22A699 Ali Shahrokhi v. Kizzy J. S. Burrow Nevada 2023-02-03 Presumed Complete None
22-6224 Ali Shahrokhi v. Kizzy J. S. Burrow Nevada 2022-12-05 Denied 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fair-trial judicial-bias procedural-due-process recusal subject-matter-jurisdiction Did the trial judge's refusal to recuse himself from presiding over the 3-day bench trial—while being an adverse party litigating against Shahrokhi— v…
22A218 Ali Shahrokhi v. Kizzy J. S. Burrow Nevada 2022-09-13 Presumed Complete None
22-5385 J. S. v. Texas Texas 2022-08-19 Denied confrontation criminal-procedure due-process juvenile-justice kent-v-united-states sixth-amendment Whether the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation extends to a hearing on whether to certify a child as an adult
21-6437 J. S. v. Kansas Kansas 2021-11-30 Denied appeal constitutional-rights due-process effective-counsel fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance right-to-appeal sixth-amendment Did J.S. have a Fourteenth Amendment right to be advised by the Court of his right to appeal?
20-849 P. F. v. J. S., et al. Kansas 2020-12-23 Denied adoption adoption-law biological-parenthood constitutional-standard due-process evolving-family-landscape family-dynamics family-rights gender-assumptions liberty-rights parental-rights Can the 'biology-plus' standard still be considered constitutional when it can no longer be justly applied?