Search

5 results for “Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility”

Case	Title	Lower Court	Docketed	Status	Tags	Question Presented
25A501	Nicholas Hansen v. Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility	Second Circuit	2025-11-03	Application	legal-filing prison-resources pro-se statute-of-limitations time-extension writ-of-certiorari	Whether a pro se prisoner's motion for an extension of time to file a writ of certiorari should be granted due to limited access to legal resources
24-5823	Jose Bernazard v. Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility	Second Circuit	2024-10-25	Denied	constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidentiary-hearing ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief	Whether a state court's denial of post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel claims violates a petitioner's due process rights …
23-7308	Marvin Holmes v. Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility	Second Circuit	2024-04-25	Denied	certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights court-of-appeals district-court due-process federal-law habeas-corpus	Did the Court of Appeals violate Appellant's Constitutional right to Due Process by not issuing a Certificate of Appealability?
23-6696	Anthony Daniels v. Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility	Second Circuit	2024-02-07	Denied	due-process due-process-violation ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment suggestive-identification	Whether the District Court errored for denial of Petitioner's claim that the State Identification was suggestive, improper and the State Court conclus…
23-6343	Patrick Bowie v. Mark Miller, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility	Second Circuit	2023-12-26	Denied	authentication confrontation-clause crawford-v-washington criminal-procedure due-process evidence-authentication hearsay ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel strickland-v-washington	Is the right to confrontation violated when inculpatory letters are admitted into evidence without a statement by a handwriting expert?