| 24-754 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2025-01-16 |
Denied |
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations penn-central-test property-rights regulatory-takings |
Whether Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York should be clarified or overruled to provide clarity in regulatory takings cases |
| 24A435 |
Mount Clemens Recreational Bowl, Inc., et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2024-10-31 |
Presumed Complete |
economic-impact fifth-amendment investment-backed-expectations just-compensation penn-central-test regulatory-taking |
Whether a regulatory restriction that substantially interferes with a business's economic expectations constitutes a compensable taking under the Fift… |
| 22-7874 |
Joshua Piland, et ux. v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2023-06-27 |
Denied |
child-welfare due-process faith-based family-division governmental-interest least-restrictive-means natural-family parental-rights social-contract social-pact |
Should parents be able to appeal jurisdiction in a termination case? |
| 22-181 |
Resurrection School, et al. v. Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-08-29 |
Denied |
capable-of-repetition-yet-evading-review circuit-conflict constitutional-claims government-defendants judicial-review mootness mootness-doctrine presumption-of-good-faith voluntary-cessation |
Whether government defendants must satisfy the 'absolutely clear' standard under the voluntary cessation exception to mootness |
| 18-7041 |
Mark P. Donaldson v. Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, et al. |
Michigan |
2018-12-17 |
Denied |
administrative-hearing administrative-procedure cms-compliance due-process federal-preemption federal-regulations hearing-rights medicaid medicaid-regulations preemption procedural-due-process state-agencies supremacy-clause |
Whether Mr. Donaldson's procedural due process rights afforded him under Medicaid including 45 C.F.R. 155.530 (a), (b)(1) - (3) have been violated by … |