Search

6 results for “Richard Rynn, et al.”

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Tags Question Presented
25-508 Richard Rynn, et al. v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC, et al. Arizona 2025-10-24 Denied civil-procedure due-process ex-parte fourteenth-amendment fraud-on-court jurisdictional-defect 1. Whether due process is violated when state courts rely on a concealed ex parte proceeding and fraudulent allegations —previously adjudicated as l…
25A159 Richard Rynn, et al. v. Craig Jennings, et al. Ninth Circuit 2025-08-06 Application appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process judicial-bias ninth-circuit record-correction Whether the Ninth Circuit's procedural actions, including deferring motions to correct the record and permitting premature briefing, constitute a viol…
24A1242 Richard Rynn, et al. v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC, et al. Arizona 2025-06-16 Presumed Complete abuse-of-process administrative-agencies certiorari-review constitutional-due-process fraud state-court-proceedings Whether state courts and administrative agencies have systematically violated constitutional due process rights through abuse of process and fraudulen…
24A1167 Richard Rynn, et al. v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC, et al. Arizona 2025-05-30 Application constitutional-violation due-process fraud-on-court judicial-review procedural-bar rule-60(b) Whether a state court's procedural bar to Rule 60(b) motions alleging fraud on the court violates constitutional due process principles
24A415 Richard Rynn, et al. v. Daniel Washburn, et al. Arizona 2024-10-29 Presumed Complete child-custody constitutional-rights due-process ex-parte-injunction parental-rights state-court Whether a state court can issue an ex parte child custody injunction without notice when there is no showing of imminent harm to the child
23-151 Richard Rynn, et al. v. UHS of Phoenix, LLC, et al. Arizona 2023-08-16 Denied civil-procedure civil-rights compensation due-process parental-rights standing Can court judgement be entirely untrue, refer to a previous vague judgement in dispute from an ex parte dependency case in violation of due process?