Search
8 results for “Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.”
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-308 | Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2025-09-16 | Pending | inter-partes-review patent-act patent-applications printed-publications prior-art statutory-interpretation | Whether patent applications that became publicly accessible only after the challenged patent's critical date are "prior art * * * printed publicatio… |
| 25A14 | Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2025-07-03 | Presumed Complete | america-invents-act critical-date inter-partes-review patent-challenge printed-publication prior-art | Whether an abandoned patent application that was not publicly accessible before a patent's critical date can nonetheless qualify as 'prior art' under … |
| 24-548 | Arbor Global Strategies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2024-11-15 | Denied | administrative-procedure-act agency-decision inter-partes-review patent-trial-and-appeal-board prosecutorial-function separation-of-functions | Whether Section 554(d) prohibits the same Patent Trial and Appeal Board panel from instituting and deciding inter partes review because institution is… |
| 24A303 | Arbor Global Strategies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2024-09-30 | Presumed Complete | administrative-procedure-act agency-adjudication inter-partes-review patent-invalidation patent-trial-and-appeal-board separation-of-powers | Whether the Administrative Procedure Act prohibits a Patent Trial and Appeal Board panel from both instituting and deciding the merits of an inter par… |
| 21-1085 | Ikorongo Texas LLC, et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2022-02-07 | Denied | convenience convenience-standard forum-non-conveniens judicial-discretion mandamus patent-rights statutory-venue transfer venue venue-transfer | Can a district court transfer a matter to a statutorily proscribed district based on expressly disregarding undisputed facts creating the proscription |
| 21A165 | Ikorongo Texas LLC, et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2021-11-19 | Presumed Complete | None | |
| 19-101 | Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2019-07-19 | Denied | appellate-review burden-of-proof credibility-determinations credibility-of-witnesses expert-testimony jury-trial jury-trial-rights jury-verdict patent-infringement patent-invalidity patent-validity seventh-amendment standard-of-review | Whether an appellate court may reverse a jury verdict based on its own view that expert testimony was credible, 'unrebutted,' and 'uncontradicted,' or… |
| 18-190 | Queen's University at Kingston v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2018-08-13 | Denied | administrative-procedure-act burden-of-proof due-process enablement inter-partes-review patent-invalidity prior-art | Does the Federal Circuit's requirement that patent owners negate enablement of prior art in the first instance invert the statutory burden of proving … |