| 22-1069 |
Benefit Strategies West, Inc., et al. v. Roger Naumann, et al. |
Arizona |
2023-05-04 |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure erisa-jurisdiction erisa-plan-administration erisa-preemption erisa-statutory-interpretation federal-jurisdiction federal-preemption participant-claims plan-administration state-court-jurisdiction trustee-rights |
Whether the Arizona Court of Appeals violated ERISA's exclusive federal jurisdiction and preemption doctrine by asserting state law and state-court ju… |
| 20-683 |
Dirk Wilke, Interim State Health Officer of North Dakota, et al. v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-11-17 |
GVR |
|
civil-rights eighth-circuit employee-benefits erisa erisa-preemption health-care-law pharmacy-benefit-managers plan-administration preemption state-regulation |
Whether ERISA preempts state laws regulating pharmacy benefit managers |
| 20-242 |
Norine Sylvia Cave v. Delta Dental of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-08-28 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
beneficiaries-rights benefits-denial breach-of-fiduciary-duties claim-adjudication erisa erisa-fiduciary-duty fiduciary-duties fiduciary-responsibility medical-records medical-records-withholding plan-administration unauthorized-benefits |
Whether a covered entity violates ERISA, by improperly denying beneficiaries' rights and further compounds such violations by approving unauthorized b… |
| 18-8813 |
Jean Bultman v. Cigna Group Insurance Company, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2019-04-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
breach-of-duty civil-procedure employee-benefits erisa fiduciary-duty plan-administration prudent-investor-rule retirement-plans standing statute-of-limitations |
Did the ERISA Plan Fiduciaries Breach their Duty to Provide |
| 18-523 |
W. A. Griffin v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-10-19 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
affordable-care-act anti-assignment-clause anti-assignment-clauses assignment-of-benefits civil-rights discrimination federal-financial-assistance good-old-boys-club plan-administration provider-standing section-1557 standing third-party-administrator |
Whether plan administrators discriminated against an African American female provider under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act |