| 24-7107 |
Brandon A. Dunkleberger v. Illinois |
Illinois |
2025-05-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure due-process essential-elements guilty-plea judicial-precedent plea-validity |
Is Illinois bound by this Court's rule that a guilty plea is not valid when the defendant is not informed of the essential elements of the crime? |
| 24-5312 |
Genaro Medina-Luna v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-08-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-argument criminal-procedure guilty-plea indictment-waiver jurisdictional-error plea-validity |
Is Petitioner's appellate argument that his waiver of Indictment was invalid a claim of jurisdictional error that is not waived by an unconditional gu… |
| 21-6749 |
Matthew Sullivan v. Daniel Sproul, Warden |
Seventh Circuit |
2021-12-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-v-united-states criminal-procedure guilty-plea legal-clarification misinformation plea-validity post-conviction post-conviction-relief sentencing-enhancement statutory-penalty |
May a criminal defendant attack the validity of his guilty plea when a post conviction clarification in law reveals that he was misinformed regarding … |
| 21-6602 |
Brandon Christian v. Scott Crow, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-12-14 |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure due-process factual-basis habeas-corpus plea-bargaining plea-validity sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the plea was not entered knowingly and voluntarily because the trial court failed to ensure a sufficient factual basis and advise the petition… |
| 21-5462 |
James Michael Kerns v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-08-24 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-16 18-usc-924 constitutional-vagueness crime-of-violence plea-bargaining plea-validity sentencing-challenge sessions-v-dimaya statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-davis |
Whether Count 3 conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924 is valid given the unconstitutionality of the predicate crime of violence in Count 2 |
| 20-5157 |
Denard Stokeling v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-24 |
Denied |
Relisted (3)IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split constitutional-error criminal-procedure due-process plea-bargaining plea-validity rehaif-v-united-states sentencing-enhancement violent-felony |
Whether a guilty plea entered without knowledge of the knowledge-of-status element is reversible error per se |
| 19-7197 |
Darryl William Young v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-01-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
bank-robbery colloquy constitutional-law constitutional-question-of-procedural-law criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-11 criminal-procedure-rule-20 direct-appeal district-court-jurisdiction due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-question-of-statutory-law federal-rules-criminal-procedure jurisdictional-venue overbroad-interpretation plea-agreement plea-validity procedural-requirements sentencing statutory-interpretation statutory-law venue waiver |
Whether the district court had jurisdictional venue to accept the petitioner's plea agreement and sentence when the requirements of Federal Rules of C… |
| 18-5949 |
Charles Litton Morris v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-09-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
2254-d-1-2 appointment-of-counsel brady-strickland-constitutional-claims claims-ignored constitutional-violation district-court-failure due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus insufficient-evidence judicial-bias personal-jurisdiction plea-validity subject-matter-jurisdiction supremacy-clause supremacy-clause-conflict-preemption |
issues being raised |
| 18-5447 |
David V. Rock v. Charmaine Bracy, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
2018-08-06 |
Denied |
IFP |
burden-of-proof constitutional-error due-process enhancement evidence habeas-corpus plea-bargaining plea-validity presumption-of-innocence reasonable-doubt sixth-amendment |
Whether the presumption of innocence and burden of proof requirements are unconstitutionally repealed in enhancement cases, requiring the defendant to… |