prohibited-transaction
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-1094 | AT&T Services, Inc., et al. v. Robert J. Bugielski, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2024-04-09 | Denied | Amici (1)Relisted (2) | arm's-length-agreement circuit-conflict employee-benefit-plan employee-benefits erisa fiduciary-duty precedent prohibited-transaction | Whether a fiduciary to an employee benefit plan causes the plan to engage in a prohibited transaction under Section 406(a)(1)(C) of the Employee Retir… |
| 23-1007 | Casey Cunningham, et al. v. Cornell University, et al. | Second Circuit | 2024-03-13 | Judgment Issued | Amici (10)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | circuit-split erisa fiduciary-duty party-in-interest pleading-requirements prohibited-transaction statutory-interpretation | Whether a plaintiff can state a claim by alleging that a plan fiduciary engaged in a transaction constituting a furnishing of goods, services, or faci… |
| 21-761 | OptumHealth Care Solutions, LLC v. Sandra M. Peters | Fourth Circuit | 2021-11-22 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | circuit-split erisa fiduciary fiduciary-duty party-in-interest prohibited-transaction service-provider tenth-circuit-rule | Whether a service provider must have a preexisting relationship with a plan to qualify as a 'party in interest' under ERISA § 406(a) |