service-provider
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-171 | Cox Communications, Inc., et al. v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al. | Fourth Circuit | 2024-08-16 | Granted | CVSGAmici (37)Relisted (2) | copyright-infringement digital-copyright material-contribution secondary-liability service-provider willful-violation | Did the Fourth Circuit err in holding that a service provider can be held liable for 'materially contributing' to copyright infringement merely becaus… |
| 23-1264 | X Corp., fka Twitter, Inc. v. United States | District of Columbia | 2024-06-03 | Denied | Amici (2) | communications-provider electronic-communications executive-privilege first-amendment nondisclosure-order service-provider strict-scrutiny user-privacy warrant-service | Whether an electronic communications service provider can be compelled to produce potentially privileged user communications before adjudication of th… |
| 23-1025 | D.L. Markham DDS, MSD, Incorporated 401(K) Plan, et al. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company | Fifth Circuit | 2024-03-18 | Denied | Response Waived | 29-usc-1106 29-usc-1108 amendment-opportunity erisa-plan exemptions judicial-discretion motion-to-dismiss prohibited-transactions service-provider statutory-prohibition | What transactions between an ERISA plan and a service provider are prohibited by 29 U.S.C. § 1106(a)(1)(C) unless exempt under 29 U.S.C. § 1108(b)(2)? |
| 21-761 | OptumHealth Care Solutions, LLC v. Sandra M. Peters | Fourth Circuit | 2021-11-22 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | circuit-split erisa fiduciary fiduciary-duty party-in-interest prohibited-transaction service-provider tenth-circuit-rule | Whether a service provider must have a preexisting relationship with a plan to qualify as a 'party in interest' under ERISA § 406(a) |