| 24-51 |
Randall Bock v. Candace Lapidus Sloane, et al. |
First Circuit |
2024-07-17 |
Denied |
|
judicial-immunity licensing-board market-participants professional-licensing quasi-judicial-immunity sherman-act sovereign-immunity state-action-doctrine state-action-immunity supreme-court-precedent |
antitrust-law |
| 23A610 |
Randall Bock v. Candace Lapidus Sloane, et al. |
First Circuit |
2024-01-02 |
Presumed Complete |
|
antitrust-law licensing-board market-participants midcal-test north-carolina-dental state-action-immunity |
Whether a state licensing board composed of active market participants can claim antitrust immunity without meeting the active supervision requirement… |
| 23A108 |
Micah Uetricht, et al. v. Chicago Parking Meters, LLC |
Seventh Circuit |
2023-08-08 |
Presumed Complete |
|
antitrust-law midcal-aluminum monopoly-pricing parker-v-brown sherman-act state-action-immunity |
Whether the Parker state-action immunity doctrine, as refined by Midcal Aluminum, extends to a private equity firm's 75-year monopoly control of a mun… |
| 20-1018 |
Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board v. Federal Trade Commission |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-01-28 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
administrative-law appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure collateral-order-doctrine interlocutory-appeal public-entities state-action-immunity |
Whether and under what conditions orders denying state-action immunity to public entities are immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctri… |
| 19-236 |
Achashverosh Adnah Ammiyhuwd v. Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2019-08-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure collateral-order-doctrine dred-scott due-process equal-protection foreign-sovereign-immunity functional-immunity habeas-corpus standing state-action-immunity yick-wo |
Whether orders denying state-action-immunity, functional-immunity, foreign-sovereign-immunity, are immediately appealable under the collateral-order-d… |
| 18-912 |
AmeriCare MedServices, Inc. v. City of Anaheim, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2019-01-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
active-supervision antitrust antitrust-law civil-procedure commercial-market-participant commercial-participant federal-antitrust-law market-competition municipal-services preemption regulatory-capacity state-action-doctrine state-action-immunity |
Is a municipality that is not authorized by state law exempt from federal antitrust liability in the ambulance services market? |