| 22-6349 |
Daniel Nepomuceno v. Erin Reyes, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-12-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
28-usc-2254 constitutional-rights credibility-determination due-process federal-habeas guilty-plea habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief state-post-conviction-proceedings |
Could reasonable jurists debate whether a state court's dispositive credibility determination regarding federal constitutional rights, based on a writ… |
| 19-5658 |
Eric C. Burgie v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
2019-08-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights collateral-review constitutional-claim due-process habeas-corpus habeas-relief ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel standing state-collateral-review state-post-conviction-proceedings state-proceeding |
this court to answer whether the due process clause requires appointment of counsel to those prisoners where state collateral review is the first oppo… |
| 18-8201 |
Robert Edward Butler v. Howard W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-provisions court-appeal due-process federal-habeas federal-habeas-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdiction legal-review procedural-default retroactivity state-post-conviction-proceedings statutory-provisions writ-of-certiorari |
1. Whether Supreme Court's decisions in Buck v. Davis 137 S.Ct. 759 (2017), Trevino v. Thaler, and Martinez v. Ryan apply retroactively to Robert Butl… |
| 18-7186 |
Corey Ian Weidner v. Jeri Taylor, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-counsel federal-habeas federal-habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel new-rule post-conviction-review state-law state-post-conviction-proceedings strickland-standard |
WHETHER, WHEN A STATE POST-CONVICTION COURT DECIDES THAT
COUNSEL DID NOT NEED TO TAKE SOME ACTION UNDER STATE LAW TO
BE EFFECTIVE, THE STATE COURT DEC… |