third-party-confession
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-7023 | Johnny Mack Sketo Calhoun v. Florida | Florida | 2024-03-19 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-law federal-constitution florida-law state-criminal-law third-party-confession third-party-confessions | Does the manner in which Florida deals with third party confessions violate defendant's rights under the Due Process Clause of the Federal Constitutio… |
| 22-581 | Heidi R. Steward, Acting Director, Oregon Department of Corrections v. Frank E. Gable | Ninth Circuit | 2022-12-22 | Denied | Relisted (2) | actual-innocence chambers-v-mississippi due-process evidence evidence-rule habeas-corpus hearsay hearsay-exception recantation third-party-confession | Whether Oregon Evidence Code Rule 804(8)(c) violates the Due Process Clause by excluding a third-party confession that is recanted and inconsistent wi… |
| 22-77 | David Brown v. Louisiana | Louisiana | 2022-07-27 | Denied | Amici (3)Relisted (7) | brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland criminal-evidence criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence favorable-evidence material-evidence materiality-standard third-party-confession | Whether a defendant's due process rights are violated when another person's confession stating that he and someone else committed the criminal act, wi… |
| 19-7309 | James Milton Dailey v. Florida | Florida | 2020-01-15 | Denied | Amici (5)Relisted (5)IFP | capital-punishment chambers-exception chambers-v-mississippi codefendant-confession due-process fifth-amendment hearsay hearsay-evidence innocence parole third-party-confession | Was the Florida Supreme Court's analysis of Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973), employing a factor-based approach that has been embraced by … |
| 19-6203 | Eric Christopher Barrass v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2019-10-08 | Denied | IFP | chambers-v-mississippi constitutional-law double-jeopardy due-process federal-courts federal-review green-v-georgia habeas-corpus standard-of-review state-court-decision state-courts third-party-confession | Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in applying 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to the state appellate court's unexplained decision, rather than 'looking through' … |