Did Defendant Golden Nugget discriminate against Plaintiff when it hired 300 employees with different eligibility requirements based on a discriminatory computer assessment, and no interview?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did Defendant Golden Nugget discriminate against Plaintiff when it [ hired 300 employees with different eligibility requirements based on a discriminatory computer assessment, and no interview? Can it be r believed, or is it pretextual, when Defendant then claims it did not ! hire a facility Supertvisor to supervise the 300 employees that it . claims it hired? : ; | 2. Did Defendant Golden Nugget discriminate against Plaintiff when it > did not consider his qualifications to be hired for the position of | facility supervisor to supervise the 300 employees it claims it hired. Not only did Defendant not consider Plaintiff's application for | : facility supervisor, but also, Defendant discriminated against Plaintiff when it told him, “The results of the Assessment indicate 7 that you wouid not be considered for other Positions, so no further | Assessment is required.” | 3. Did Defendant Golden Nugget discriminate against Plaintiff when it failed and refused to consider him for other positions for which he i applied and was qualified based on the same computer Assessment | and no interview for the positions? | 4. Should this case be returned to the U. S. District Court for the , Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, for the Age { discrimination claim which was not considered in the Magistrate i. Judge’s Recommendation? l. | i. i] 1 Lu (f>