Whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia unreasonably affirmed the Petitioner's conviction on the charge of First-Degree Murder

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Contrary to precedent set in Yeager v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 761, 433 S.E.2d 248 (1993) and rule 3A:16 of the Rules of Supreme Court of Virginia, did the Court of Appeals of Virginia unreasonably affirm the Petitioner's conviction on the charge of First-Degree Murder after the trial court denied the objection . . from the Petitioner to the Jury Instruction Number Eleven as the instruction impermissibly ‘singled out for emphasis' the factors to be considered in establishing element of premeditation and deliberation ? . II. Did the Court of Appeals of Virginia unreasonably affirm . the Petitioner's conviction on the charge of First-Degree Murder even though the evidence was insufficient to show that he was the individual who committed the crime or that he acted with premeditation ? . Contrary to United States v. Strayhorn, 572 U.S. 1145(2014), is there sufficient evidence to infer that the Petitioner was in possession of the alleged murder weapon and other items found near the weapon during the commission of the crime ? Is there sufficient evidence to infer that it was the . Petitioner who was in possession of the cell Phone while it was moving, contrary to prosecution's own DNA evidence ? Is there sufficient evidence to infer the identity of the car or the driver ? ; : : Is just a matching name sufficient to prove the authorship : . of internet search records ?