How can Verizon's dereliction of duty and reckless disregard for necessary medical treatment be acceptable under the ADA/Title VII when Verizon refused to provide reasonable accommodations for PTSD?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Gorbea appealed to The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Pro Se requesting the consideration of the “extraordinary circumstances” and if considered, then the questions for review are 1. How can Verizon dereliction of duty and reckless disregard for the necessary medical treatment be acceptable under the ADA/Title Vil in much as not to accept and provide reasonable accommodations for PTSD requested by Gorbea when medical documentation provided by Verizon’s Carrier and provided by Gorbea's Physicians have been received by Verizon in accordance with Verizon policy just as similar situated technicians do? 2. How can Verizon establish a pretext of job abandonment when Verizon issued a written warning, adverse employment action, for Gorbea “TO LEAVE VERIZON’S PREMISE.” and refused to provide reasonable accommodation for her PTSD? 3. How could Gorbea return to work safely “to perform essential functions of her job/show up to work” at Verizon in any capacity, when Verizon refused to acknowledge and provide necessary reasonable accommodation for her PTSD?