No. 23-1005

Ann Redd-Oyedele v. Santa Clara County Office of Education, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: age-discrimination burden-of-proof civil-rights disparate-impact due-process employment employment-practices preponderance-of-evidence racial-discrimination summary-judgment
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA Securities EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Court may properly grant summary judgment where a party failed to establish, by a preponderance of evidence, as shown in the records, that the party defendant's excuse for failure to promote was not a pretext for racial and or age discrimination

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a Court may properly grant summary judgment where a party failed to establish, by a preponderance of evidence, as shown in the records, that the party defendant’s excuse for failure to promote was not a pretext for racial and or age discrimination. Whether a Court may properly deny summary judgment on racial discrimination claim where a pro se party presented credible and relevant evidence of historical racial prejudice against African American employees of the Respondent. Whether the employment practices and policies of Respondent SCCOE has a disparate impact on minority employees of the SCCOE, especially African Americans.

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Santa Clara County Office of Education to respond filed.
2024-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Ann Redd-Oyedele
Ann Redd-Oyedele — Petitioner
Ann Redd-Oyedele — Petitioner
Santa Clara County Office of Education
Eric J. BengtsonDavis Bengtson & Young, APLC, Respondent
Eric J. BengtsonDavis Bengtson & Young, APLC, Respondent