| 21-1437 |
Carol M. Kam v. Dallas County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-05-13 |
Denied |
civil-rights due-process judicial-conduct judicial-misconduct non-final-orders probate-court rooker-feldman-doctrine standing state-court-orders state-court-ruling |
Can the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to non-final state court rulings? |
| 21-461 |
Carol M. Kam v. John B. Peyton, Jr. |
Fifth Circuit |
2021-09-27 |
Denied |
civil-rights due-process final-orders judicial-procedure legal-finality rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-orders texas-statutes unsigned-orders |
Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two incomplete, illegal proposed State Court Rulings |
| 19-479 |
Carol M. Kam v. John B. Peyton, Jr. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-10-10 |
Denied |
associate-judge judicial-authority judicial-misconduct probate-court probate-law rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-jurisdiction state-court-rulings state-law void-orders |
Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two Void 'proposed' State Court Rulings? |
| 19-31 |
Carol M. Kam v. Dallas County, Texas, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2019-07-03 |
Denied |
associate-judge dallas-county judicial-authority judicial-misconduct probate-court probate-court-procedure rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court state-court-jurisdiction state-law void-judgment void-rulings |
Does the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine apply to two void 'proposed' State Court rulings produced by a former Associate Judge, employed solely by Dallas Coun… |