| 24-5363 |
Anthony Wong v. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-08-21 |
Denied |
court-of-appeals false-testimony federal-employee judicial-review perjury sanctions |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals erred in denying Motions for Sanctions and Referral for Perjury by a federal employee, despite alleged false testimo… |
| 23-6321 |
Barbara Johnson-Luster v. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-12-21 |
Denied |
appellate-procedure civil-rights court-appointed-counsel disability-rights due-process equal-protection exceptional-circumstances title-vii |
Whether an appellant in the Circuit Courts, with an invisible disability and previous court appointed attorneys in the Lower District Courts should re… |
| 22-540 |
Paul Anthony Riojas v. Department of the Army, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-12-13 |
Denied |
circuit-court-standards civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review military-court-review military-justice service-member standard-of-review |
Whether the proper scope and standard of review for a service member's habeas corpus petition challenging a military court proceeding is in accordance… |
| 22-162 |
Tariq B. Alabbassi v. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-08-23 |
Denied |
administrative-procedure administrative-time-limit burden-of-proof circuit-court civil-rights due-process eeo-complaint employment-discrimination federal-regulations statute-of-limitations |
When does the 45-day time limit start under 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1)? |
| 22-1 |
Lynn Brown, as Appointed Successor and Representative of Now Deceased Howard M. Berry v. Christine E. Wormuth, Secretary of the Army, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2022-06-30 |
Denied |
administrative-procedure-act agency-review civil-procedure deference government-procedure judicial-review military military-deference standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) incorporates a presumption of 'unusual deference' in all cases involving the military" |