Search
6 results for “Jaime Luevano”
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-5509 | Jaime Luevano v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | Fifth Circuit | 2022-09-06 | Dismissed | civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction standing takings | Whether the Petitioners' First Amendment rights were violated by the government's actions |
| 21-8112 | Jaime Luevano v. Ivanka Trump, et al. | Second Circuit | 2022-06-09 | Dismissed | 4th-amendment civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction standing | Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims alleging violations of their constitutional rights under the First and Fourth Amen… |
| 21-7453 | Jaime Luevano v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2022-03-24 | Dismissed | administrative-law due-process equal-protection medical-marijuana standing takings | Whether the state's denial of a permit to operate a medical marijuana dispensary violates the Due Process Clause |
| 21-6953 | Jaime Luevano v. Hillary R. Clinton, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2022-01-25 | Denied | antitrust civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech standing | Whether the Sham Commercial Lease Exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine applies to the facts of this case |
| 21-5619 | Jaime Luevano v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2021-09-08 | Denied | civil-procedure civil-rights due-process patent standing takings | Whether the lower court erred in its application of the Due Process Clause to the petitioner's claims |
| 20-7662 | Jaime Luevano v. Lee Yeakel, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, et al. | Fifth Circuit | 2021-04-06 | Denied | 4th-amendment civil-rights due-process privacy standing surveillance | Whether the government's warrantless surveillance of a person's location and movements through their cell phone violates the Fourth Amendment's protec… |