Search
6 results for “Raymond H. Pierson, III”
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-537 | Raymond H. Pierson, III v. Phyliss M. Rushing | California | 2025-11-04 | Denied | constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment insurance-litigation medical-emergency | 1a. Isn't it true that under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, that Dr. Pierson, a self-represented party without alternat… |
| 24A914 | Raymond H. Pierson, III v. Phyliss M. Rushing | California | 2025-03-25 | Presumed Complete | appellate-relief certiorari judicial-procedure pro-se supreme-court time-extension | Whether a pro se litigant's request for a sixty-day extension to file a petition for writ of certiorari meets the legal standards for extraordinary re… |
| 24-140 | Raymond H. Pierson, III v. Northern California Collection Service, Inc., et al. | California | 2024-08-07 | Denied | access-to-courts due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment separation-of-powers vexatious-litigant | Whether the California Vexatious Litigant Statute unconstitutionally violates due process and separation of powers by restricting pro se litigants' ac… |
| 23-1165 | Raymond H. Pierson, III v. CSAA Insurance Services, Inc., et al. | California | 2024-05-01 | Denied | civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process duty-to-settle fourteenth-amendment good-faith-dealing insurance insurance-law public-interest standing third-party-liability tort | Whether injured third parties can directly sue an insurer for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, even without obtaining a … |
| 23A528 | Raymond H. Pierson, III v. CSAA Insurance Services, Inc., et al. | California | 2023-12-12 | Presumed Complete | appellate-relief certiorari judicial-procedure pro-se supreme-court time-extension | Whether a pro se litigant's request for a sixty-day extension to file a petition for writ of certiorari meets the legal standards for extraordinary re… |
| 21-815 | Raymond H. Pierson, III v. Bruce S. Rogow, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2021-12-01 | Denied | appeals civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-appellate-procedure federal-courts jurisdictional-limits notice-of-appeal pro-se-litigant rules-of-civil-procedure service-of-documents standing | Has a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying the relevance of the resetting of the end date for the filing of the Notice of Appeal under FRAP … |