Foucha-v-Louisiana
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-6040 | Graham L. Stowe v. Gregory Van Rybroek, Director, Mendota Mental Health Institute | Seventh Circuit | 2024-11-26 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | confinement due-process foucha-v-louisiana mental-institution ngi-acquittee not-mentally-ill | Whether the Wisconsin court's decision is contrary to and an unreasonable application of Foucha v. Louisiana because it permits the state to confine N… |
| 23-7418 | James Dow Vandivere v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2024-05-08 | Denied | IFP | adam-walsh-act burden-of-proof civil-commitment due-process foucha-v-louisiana judicial-procedure kansas-v-hendricks liberty-interest | Whether the lower courts have impermissibly shifted the burden of proof from the Government to a citizen-detainee at a release hearing under the Adam … |
| 19-8550 | Wayne Carl Nicolaison v. Minnesota | Minnesota | 2020-05-28 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-commitment due-process equal-protection Foucha-v-Louisiana liberty mental-illness | Whether civil commitment can be continued based on a 'fictional future behavior/crime' in violation of Foucha v. Louisiana |
| 18-7742 | Luis A. Serna v. County of Hennepin, Minnesota | Eighth Circuit | 2019-02-04 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-commitment civil-rights due-process foucha-v-louisiana future-dangerous-behavior heck-doctrine kingsley-v-hendrickson presumption-of-innocence section-1983 speculation state-speculation | Is the 'Petitioner' entitled to [a] defense of [the] 'presumption of innocence' upon a State's assertion of 'future dangerous behavior' via pure 'spec… |
| 18-7375 | Wayne Nicolaison v. County of Hennepin, Minnesota | Eighth Circuit | 2019-01-11 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-commitment civil-rights clear-and-convincing-evidence constitutional-violation due-process foucha-standard foucha-v-louisiana indefinite-commitment presumption-of-innocence section-1983 | Is the 'Petitioner' entitled to [a] defense of [the] 'presumption of innocence' upon a State's assertion of 'future dangerous behavior' by purely mere… |