| 25A284 |
Vincent Terry v. Teresa Bailey, et al. |
Georgia |
2025-09-11 |
Application |
|
extension-of-time georgia-supreme-court legal-complexity pro-se-petition supreme-court-rule writ-of-certiorari |
Whether the Supreme Court will grant a 30-day extension of time to file a petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 13.1 when the petitioner demonstr… |
| 24-5992 |
Andrew W. Bell v. Fulton County, Georgia, et al. |
Georgia |
2024-11-19 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeal-procedure ejectment-claim georgia-supreme-court procedural-due-process property-dispute statutory-interpretation |
Did the Supreme Court of Georgia improperly reject Petitioner's appeal under O.C.G.A. § 5-6-35(j) and violate procedural due process? |
| 21-754 |
Travis Levi Parrott v. Murray Tatum, Warden |
Georgia |
2021-11-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal-denial certificate-of-appealability certificate-of-probable-cause constitutional-right effective-assistance-of-counsel extraneous-evidence georgia-supreme-court habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prior-convictions procedural-default |
Whether the Georgia Supreme Court Erred in Denying Mr. Parrott's Application for Certificate of Probable Cause to Appeal the Denial of His Petition fo… |
| 19-691 |
Arthur Lawton Clark v. Georgia |
Georgia |
2019-12-02 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
404b-evidence circuit-court-split circuit-split d.c.-circuit-precedent due-process evidence-rule federal-rules-of-evidence georgia-supreme-court intrinsic-evidence intrinsic-evidence-rule prior-bad-act-evidence prior-bad-acts |
Were petitioner's due process rights violated by the Supreme Court of Georgia's overly broad application of the 'intrinsic evidence' rule? |
| 19-6435 |
Iyang Peter Oduok v. Fulton DeKalb Hospital Authority, dba Grady Memorial Hospital, et al. |
Georgia |
2019-10-29 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-procedure-preemption constitutional-violation due-process federal-law georgia-supreme-court judicial-procedure preemption rule-13 rule-38 writ-of-certiorari |
Does Georgia Supreme Court Rule 38 conflict with federal law and preempt it? |
| 19-87 |
Jerome Burgess v. Phil Hall, Warden |
Georgia |
2019-07-17 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-counsel brady-v-maryland brady-violation criminal-appeal exculpatory-evidence georgia-supreme-court ineffective-assistance mental-competency plea-bargaining strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Did the Georgia Supreme Court err in failing to find that Petitioner's appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance? |
| 18-613 |
W. A. Griffin v. Aetna Health Inc., et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-11-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
assignee-rights civil-procedure document-request erisa erisa-benefits erisa-statutory-penalty georgia-law georgia-supreme-court o.c.g.a.-9-3-22 o.c.g.a.-9-3-28 plan-administrator retroactive-assignment standing state-law statute-of-limitations statutory-penalty |
Whether the District court borrowed the appropriate state law for ERISA statutory penalty |