| 25A849 |
Michael Prime v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2026-01-29 |
Application |
|
appellate-review cryptocurrency-seizure federal-jurisdiction motion-to-reconsider property-forfeiture rule-41g |
Question not identified. |
| 24A554 |
Andres Fernando Cabezas v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2024-12-05 |
Presumed Complete |
|
criminal-forfeiture cryptocurrency digital-property indigent-prisoner pro-se rule-41g |
Whether digital cryptocurrency can constitute property subject to criminal forfeiture and what constitutes sufficient notice for return of property un… |
| 24-5133 |
Brian Wright v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-07-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
district-court equitable-jurisdiction exceptional-circumstances federal-insurance federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure motion-to-return person ramsden-factors rule-41g standing |
Did Federal Insurance Company have standing to file a motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) |
| 22-6419 |
Brian Wright v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-12-29 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
asset-forfeiture cash-seizure civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-procedure property-rights rule-41g |
Should Mr. Wright be allowed a return of his seized cash? |
| 22-6305 |
Kaleb L. Basey v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-12-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment campbell-ewald civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process fourth-amendment government-liability property-rights property-seizure rule-41g standing |
Whether a person seeking return of illegally-seized property under Fed. R. Crim. P. Rule 41(g) has an absolute right to reject the government's offer … |
| 21-7319 |
Abraham A. Augustin v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-03-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
ancillary-jurisdiction civil-action criminal-investigation due-process equity federal-court property-seizure return-of-property rule-41(g) rule-41g |
Whether the United States indictment of a defendant created ancillary jurisdiction over the property |
| 19-8918 |
Donovan G. Davis, Jr. v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court civil-procedure criminal-procedure executive-branch judicial-branch judicial-interpretation property-return rule-41g standing statutory-construction statutory-interpretation |
Federal-Rules-of-Criminal-Procedure-41(g) |
| 19-8464 |
Jamal Mitchell, aka Boo v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-05-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
ancillary-proceeding civil-procedure direct-appeal due-process forfeiture-order intervening-change-in-law rule-41g rule-60b standing |
Does an order have to be first challenged on direct appeal before the order can be later challenged in an ancillary proceeding based on an intervening… |
| 19-8366 |
Andres Fernando Cabezas v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-04-27 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeals appellate-procedure circuit-split civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction forfeiture property-recovery property-rights rule-41g subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Does a district court have subject-matter jurisdiction to decide 41(g) motions for recovery of property that is unrelated to a criminal judgment on ap… |
| 18-7615 |
Michael Alexander Bacon v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2019-01-28 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-split criminal-justice-process criminal-procedure evidentiary-inquiry fact-finding factual-dispute federal-rule-41 federal-rule-of-criminal-procedure-41(g) government-possession post-conviction-motion property-return property-seizure rule-41g seized-property |
What evidentiary inquiry is required when the government responds to a post-conviction motion under Rule 41(g) by asserting that it lacks physical pos… |