video-privacy-protection-act

5 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
25-868 Brandon Hughes v. National Football League Second Circuit 2026-01-21 Pending Response Waived consumer-rights data-disclosure personally-identifiable-information statutory-interpretation video-privacy-protection-act video-service-provider The Video Privacy Protection Act ("VPPA") prohibits a "video tape service provider" from "knowingly disclos[ing], to any person, personally identifiab…
25-459 Michael Salazar v. Paramount Global, dba 247Sports Sixth Circuit 2025-10-15 Granted Relisted (2) audiovisual-services consumer-definition disclosure-liability personally-identifiable-information statutory-interpretation video-privacy-protection-act The question here is whether the phrase "goods or services from a video tape service provider," as used in the VPPA's definition of "consumer," refers…
25-228 Detrina Solomon v. Flipps Media, Inc., dba FITE, dba FITE TV Second Circuit 2025-08-27 Denied circuit-split personally-identifiable-information privacy-law reasonable-foreseeability statutory-interpretation video-privacy-protection-act The Video Privacy Protection Act forbids a "video tape service provider" from disclosing without consent "personally identifiable information," which …
24-994 National Basketball Association v. Michael Salazar Second Circuit 2025-03-18 Denied Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (8) article-iii-standing circuit-split consumer-rights personal-information third-party-disclosure video-privacy-protection-act Whether a consumer claiming harm from personal information disclosure must plead public revelation to establish Article III standing, or if disclosure…
22-6202 Peter Gakuba v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board Illinois 2022-12-02 Dismissed Response WaivedIFP criminal-procedure exclusionary-rule grand-jury grand-jury-indictment jurisdiction jurisdictional-error privacy-protection statutory-rape video-privacy-protection-act void-judgment vppa-violation Gakuba's criminal indictment was void due to violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act