Why was Plaintiff issued disciplinary actions for following Defendants' code-of-conduct and absolute-relief-procedures?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Why was Plaintiff issued disciplinary actions for following Defendants Kimberly-Clark Chester PA LLC. And Kimberly-Clark Corp. Code of Conduct and absolute relief procedures? 2. If Subpoena that was handed to Plaintiff by another hourly worker was valid, why was Plaintiff not taken off of the regular work schedule for that day; to attend Arbitration Hearing? 3. Why were all the males, under the age of 60 years old in Plaintiffs department who received “subpoenas” taken off of the regular work schedule to attend the Arbitration Hearing? . 4. Why was Grievance NO: 10-10, showing that I, Plaintiff was in support of Joel Horne retaining his employment with Kimberly-Clark; withheld from evidence? 5. How could I, Plaintiff be terminated for violating a Last Chance Agreement from Defendant Kimberly-Clark: that I refused to agree to or sign? 6. Why was case not turned over to the Criminal Justice Department? 7. How could Joel Horne be terminated for allegedly doing something . inappropriate; Frank Brown Jr. admitted to being the person responsible for the inappropriate actions (actions Joel Horne was accused of), but only received an 18 month letter in his file? 8. Why did Kimberly-Clark management report to unemployment that I, Plaintiff was to return to work with the same position (level 3), and pay rate?