No. 20-1584
Shelia Holmes v. General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: ada americans-with-disabilities-act disability-discrimination employment employment-discrimination essential-functions essential-job-functions qualified-individual reasonable-accommodation workplace-accommodation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an employer's steel-toed shoe requirement is an essential function of a disabled employee's job for purposes of determining whether she is a 'qualified individual' under the ADA
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether an _ employer’s steel-toed shoe requirement is an essential function of a disabled employee’s job for purposes of determining whether she is a “qualified individual” under the ADA where the employer had not required the disabled employee to meet that requirement for more than a decade due to her disability and, as well, had allowed a similarlysituated employee to be excepted from the requirement?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-11
Waiver of right of respondent General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. to respond filed.
2021-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2021)
Attorneys
General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Shelia Holmes
Richard Franklin Hawkins III — The Hawkins Law Firm, PC, Petitioner
Richard Franklin Hawkins III — The Hawkins Law Firm, PC, Petitioner