Are employment-rights-for-everyone-or-just-lawyers?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4.) Rights of a 23.5 year STATE employee when denied legal representation? A. Case too complicated for a lawyer to make a profit. B. Approved for Legal Aid but there is no legal aid for "fee generating” cases. C. Denied requests for legal representation by the Court. D. Judge's Alma mater is the Defendant. E. Defendant has public funded representation by the Texas Attorney General. F. Plaintiff is a high school graduate. G. Plaintiff abused by employer following being depicted as a "Parking Nazi" in the University newspaper. F. Plaintiff continued to be abused by employer, evaluated as "being female”, , even after changing careers to escape bullying at the 1st job. G. Plaintiff continued to be abused by employer during the 3rd career. H. Defendant backdated 1st Report of injury, then suspended the Plaintiff for months, while making multiple attempts to force FMLA. |. Defendant verbally assaulted the Plaintiff, recorded & listened to it then lied about who yelled in their EEOC Response, to the Texas Workforce Commision the STXCOURT and the 5th CIRCUIT Court. J. Defendant terminated the Plaintiff after she submitted a complaint that the male inspectors were 3 to 5 years behind on the eyewash shower inspections. (including photos and database) And after hearing the 11/20/2015 audio. K. Defendant mentored, promoted and protected younger male TXSFMO failing to address the FALSE dates of the TAMU EHS Fire Safety inspections. L. VP of Finance over both EHS and Human Resources. M. If the STXCOURT would have listened to the meeting audio of 11/20/2015 the Court would have known the Plaintiff is truthful; it was the Defendants that were “insubordinate" and hostile towards the Plaintiff. 2.) Are employment rights for everyone or just lawyers?