| 22-6213 |
In Re Mark Stinson |
|
2022-12-02 |
Dismissed |
appeals case-assignment civil-procedure due-process judicial-procedure procedural-error right-to-counsel rights-to-counsel sixth-circuit standing |
Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit err by denying Mark Stinson due process and violating his right to counsel? |
| 21-8013 |
In Re Mark Stinson |
|
2022-06-01 |
Denied |
administrative-law circuit-court circuit-executive civil-procedure court-of-appeals federal-courts federal-statute judicial-administration mandamus statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Circuit Executive Staff of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1361 |
| 21-7849 |
Mark Stinson v. John P. Yates, Warden, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-05-12 |
Denied |
5th-amendment administrative-segregation confinement-standards constitutional-law due-process fifth-amendment inmate-rights prison-administration |
What limits the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment places on the authority of prison administrators to remove inmates from the general prison p… |
| 21-7757 |
Mark Stinson v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2022-05-02 |
Denied |
conflict-of-interest constitutional-provisions due-process fair-trial judicial-inquiry right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Whether a Judge inquire into the propriety of the issue? |
| 21-6517 |
Mark Stinson v. K. Cauley, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-12-07 |
Denied |
5th-amendment 8th-amendment administrative-segregation civil-rights constitutional-limits due-process fifth-amendment inmate-rights prison-administration |
What limits the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment places on the authority of prison administrators to remove inmates from the general prison p… |
| 21-5383 |
Mark Stinson v. John P. Yates, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2021-08-17 |
Denied |
conflict-of-interest constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process judicial-inquiry right-to-counsel sixth-amendment |
Whether a Judge must inquire into the propriety of the issue |
| 19-8493 |
Mark Stinson v. Dewayne Hendrix, Warden |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-05-18 |
Denied |
conspiracy criminal-law due-process federal-jurisdiction jury-trial ptsd |
Can husband and wife be charged with conspiracy despite the husband's PTSD diagnosis? |