clayton-act

8 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
25-223 LegitScript LLC v. PharmacyChecker.com LLC Ninth Circuit 2025-08-25 Denied Response Waived antitrust-injury antitrust-standing clayton-act federal-courts private-right-action treble-damages Does a private plaintiff have standing to enforce antitrust laws when the primary purpose of its business is to facilitate unlawful activity by others…
22-1230 Carolyn Fjord, et al. v. American Airlines Group, Inc., et al. Second Circuit 2023-06-22 Denied antitrust-law antitrust-merger civil-procedure clayton-act competition injunctive-relief judicial-precedent market-competition merger section-7 standing Whether the lower Courts may specifically decline to follow the decisions by this Court in deciding whether the acquisition of American Airlines by US…
21-1243 City of Oakland, California v. Oakland Raiders, et al. Ninth Circuit 2022-03-14 Denied Amici (3)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) antitrust-standing associated-general-contractors clayton-act judicial-limits lexmark-international proximate-cause prudential-balancing zone-of-interests May a court deny a plaintiff with an antitrust injury proximately caused by a defendant's antitrust violation a Clayton Act cause of action based on a…
19-570 Greg Steven Elofson v. Stephanie Bivens, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-10-31 Denied Response Waived circuit-split clayton-act judicial-economy nationwide-service nationwide-service-of-process process rico rico-statute rico-venue-process standard-oil standard-oil-co venue venue-process Does the RICO venue and process statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1965, provide for nationwide service of process?
19-148 7 West 57th Street Realty Company, LLC v. Citigroup, Inc., et al. Second Circuit 2019-07-31 Denied Response Waived antitrust-standing clayton-act financial-instruments libor market-manipulation price-fixing privity-relationship Whether an antitrust plaintiff with a direct privity relationship to a price-fixer has antitrust standing under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C…
18-1229 In Re Carolyn Fjord, et al. 2019-03-21 Denied Response Waived 7th-amendment antitrust antitrust-law bankruptcy bankruptcy-court beacon-theaters civil-procedure civil-rights clayton-act due-process jury-trial mandamus seventh-amendment Does the decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denying Petitioners the right to a jury trial for damage…
18-802 James DeHoog, et al. v. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, et al. Ninth Circuit 2018-12-21 Denied antitrust antitrust-law brown-shoe brown-shoe-v-united-states clayton-act clayton-act-section-7 market-concentration market-share merger-analysis potential-competition supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-el-paso united-states-v-el-paso-natural-gas united-states-v-penn-olin-chemical Whether the Court should reaffirm its commitment to the structural evaluation of mergers and acquisitions under § 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act
18-32 Philadelphia Taxi Association, Inc., et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Third Circuit 2018-07-05 Denied Response Waived anti-competitive anti-competitive-behavior antitrust antitrust-law clayton-act competition economic-harm illegal-activity market-competition market-power marketplace-presence monopolization predatory predatory-conduct predatory-pricing sherman-act unfair-competition When is an illegal presence in the marketplace predatory, anti-competitive and threatens to harm competition and not solely competitors?