| 25-610 |
Hansueli Overturf v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District |
California |
2025-11-25 |
Denied |
civil-procedure default-judgment due-process fourteenth-amendment hague-service-convention service-of-process |
Whether entry of default based on defective service of process violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of notice and an opportunity to be heard? |
| 25-36 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, et al. |
California |
2025-07-10 |
Denied |
14th-amendment civil-rights due-process equal-protection parental-rights restraining-order |
Should United States Constitution Civil Rights including 14th Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process under Law guarantees be applicable to Civil H… |
| 24-1323 |
Peter Kleidman v. Audrey B. Collins, Associate Justice, Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-06-30 |
Denied |
appellate-procedure briefing-rules court-of-appeals legal-theory procedural-fairness supervisory-power |
Whether the Supreme Court will use its supervisory power to require Courts of Appeals to provide parties an opportunity to be heard on new authorities… |
| 24-1060 |
Leticia T. Moreno, et al. v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, et al. |
California |
2025-04-08 |
Denied |
alien-registration confidentiality federal-preemption immigration-law regulatory-authority standing |
Whether a state may create a private cause of action allowing a non-aggrieved, non-governmental entity to regulate federal practitioners |
| 24-146 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-08-09 |
Denied |
civil-procedure due-process equal-protection family-code restraining-order sex-trafficking |
Whether a male Catholic father can obtain a restraining order under equal protection and due process principles despite familial connections to allege… |
| 24-145 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-08-09 |
Denied |
civil-procedure due-process equal-protection family-code restraining-order sex-trafficking |
Whether a male Catholic father can obtain a civil restraining order under equal protection principles despite being an Air Force affiliate with allega… |
| 24A21 |
H.C. v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-07-09 |
Presumed Complete |
equitable-tolling filing-deadline medical-disability pro-se procedural-rules supreme-court |
Whether a pro se litigant's physical disability and medical challenges can constitute good cause for equitable tolling of procedural filing deadlines … |
| 23-993 |
Peter Kleidman v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-03-12 |
Denied |
court-of-appeal due-process equal-protection error-prone-decisions judicial-procedure legal-precedent mathews-factors new-rule-of-law no-citation-rule uncitable-decisions |
Whether California's No-citation Rule is unconstitutional |
| 23A809 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-03-04 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
Question not identified. |
| 23A810 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-03-04 |
Presumed Complete |
border-search electronic-devices fourth-amendment privacy-rights probable-cause warrantless-search |
Whether the Fourth Amendment permits warrantless searches of electronic devices at the border without individualized suspicion of criminal activity |
| 23A811 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-03-04 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
Question not identified. |
| 23A812 |
Arthur Lopez v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2024-03-04 |
Presumed Complete |
appellate-review constitutional-rights criminal-defendant due-process post-conviction summary-denial |
Whether a state appellate court's summary denial of a post-conviction relief application without a reasoned opinion violates a criminal defendant's du… |
| 23-680 |
In Re Frander Salguero |
|
2023-12-22 |
Denied |
brady-rule brady-violation constitutional-duty due-process false-evidence judicial-power mandamus mandamus-petition napue-rule prosecutorial-misconduct |
Whether mandamus should compel the prosecutor to fulfill his constitutional duty and correct the known false record |
| 23-609 |
Frander Salguero v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2023-12-06 |
Denied |
constitutional-duty false-evidence habeas habeas-corpus mandamus prejudice-test prosecutor-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct structural-error |
Whether habeas is the sole remedy or remedy by mandamus is a permissible means to effectuate the constitutional duty to correct false evidence when a … |
| 23A465 |
Peter Kleidman v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2023-11-22 |
Presumed Complete |
citation-rule due-process equal-protection judicial-precedent legal-citation state-court-procedure |
Whether a state court judicial system can constitutionally adopt a rule prohibiting judicial decisions from being cited as precedent in subsequent leg… |
| 22-725 |
Peter Kleidman v. Thomas L. Willhite, Jr., Associate Justice, Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-02-02 |
Denied |
civil-procedure constitutional-discrimination due-process due-process-rights exxon federal-jurisdiction injury-in-fact jurisdiction rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-review |
Is there sufficient disarray in post-Exxon Rooker-Feldman jurisprudence to warrant clarification? |
| 22A370 |
Peter Kleidman v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-11-01 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 22-391 |
Shahrouz Jahanshahi v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2022-10-26 |
Denied |
anti-SLAPP anti-slapp-statute appellate-procedure appellate-review case-transfer civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process ghostwriting judicial-procedure standing |
Does California anti-SLAPP statute protect illegal activity? |
| 22-5276 |
Daniel Naftalovich v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Four, et al. |
California |
2022-08-03 |
Denied |
constitutional-vagueness criminal-statutory-scheme domestic-violence-prevention-act due-process emotional-calm ex-parte-restraining fundamental-rights prior-restraint-on-speech separation-of-powers void-for-vagueness |
Question not identified |
| 22A78 |
Shahrouz Jahanshahi v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2022-07-28 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 21-7914 |
Andres Santana v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District |
California |
2022-05-19 |
Denied |
appellate-rights board-of-regents civil-rights due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus people-v-wende pro-se-brief state-created-liberty-interest wende-procedure |
Whether a California Penal Code §1237(b) appeal is a state-created liberty interest under Board of Regents, and if so, whether the right to file pro s… |
| 21A86 |
Lori Sklar v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2021-10-18 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 19-7511 |
Frank Deville, et ux. v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, et al. |
California |
2020-01-31 |
Denied |
civil-procedure concealing-material-facts conflict-of-law constitutional-rights due-process federal-law fraud-particularity hearsay-evidence judicial-procedure legal-standards liberal-amendment material-facts standing |
What is the liberal ability to amend a complaint? |
| 18-7175 |
Christopher Lipsey, Jr. v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-12-27 |
Denied |
access-to-courts california-courts civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction standing takings |
Whether the ALLS role complies with the First Amendment and due process rights of individuals seeking access to the courts |
| 22A100 |
Daniel Naftalovich v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Four, et al. |
California |
|
Presumed Complete |
None |
|