| 25A889 |
Deon D. Colvin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2026-02-05 |
Application |
None |
Question not identified. |
| 25-5713 |
Emanuel Leyton Picon v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2025-09-24 |
Pending |
age-restriction constitutional-rights due-process firearms-regulation right-to-bear-arms second-amendment |
Whether the Second Amendment's guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms applies fully to 18-20-year-olds. |
| 25A163 |
Cheryl Steele v. Micah Salb |
District of Columbia |
2025-08-06 |
Presumed Complete |
attorney-of-record en-banc-review judicial-procedure mandate-recall notice-requirements pro-se-representation |
Whether a pro se litigant can challenge a court of appeals mandate when not timely informed by counsel about potential en banc review options |
| 25A38 |
Angela Powell v. Edmondson & Gallagher Property Services, LLC |
District of Columbia |
2025-07-09 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
Question not identified. |
| 24-6993 |
Deon D. Colvin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2025-04-15 |
Denied |
disqualification due-process fifth-amendment judicial-bias mandamus racial-bias |
Did the D.C. Court of Appeals deny Applicant's Fifth Amendment right to Due Process by not including 743 Fairmont Street NW LLC as a party in the proc… |
| 24-6858 |
Deon D. Colvin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2025-03-26 |
Denied |
intrajudicial-claims judicial-bias judicial-disqualification mandamus-relief objective-observer statutory-interpretation |
Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals applied an overly vague and undefined standard for determining judicial bias and mandamus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 4… |
| 24-6844 |
In Re Gayle George |
|
2025-03-25 |
Denied |
administrative-law appellate-procedure congressional-oversight constitutional-authority dc-home-rule judicial-review |
Whether the Superior Court of the District of Columbia is an agency subject to congressional oversight under the DC Home Rule Act, and whether the DC … |
| 24A789 |
Deon Colvin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2025-02-14 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 24A788 |
Deon Colvin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2025-02-14 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 24A682 |
Deon D. Colvin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2025-01-13 |
Presumed Complete |
due-process judicial-bias judicial-disqualification mandamus pro-se-litigation section-455 |
Whether a trial judge's repeated denial of motions for disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) constitutes a due process violation warranting mandam… |
| 23-6173 |
Akosua Aaebo Akhan v. Kwesi Akhan |
District of Columbia |
2023-12-06 |
Denied |
anti-stalking-order civil-rights dna-testing forced-agreement human-trafficking legal-standing necessity-defense power-of-attorney restitution standing |
Was Petitioner legally bound by the Anti-Stalking Order |
| 22-6068 |
Anthony Braxton v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2022-11-16 |
Denied |
appellate-review certiorari civil-procedure jurisdiction standing supreme-court-rules |
Whether the lower court erred in its application of the legal standards for granting a writ of certiorari |
| 21-6597 |
Jason Whren v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2021-12-14 |
Denied |
d-c-code-23-110 exceptional-circumstances hill-v-lockhart ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining strickland-v-washington |
Whether the Court of Appeals failed to apply the applicable standards |
| 20-1467 |
Michael Varco v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2021-04-20 |
Denied |
civil-rights crime-victims-rights crime-victims-rights-act dc-code district-court due-process federal-law metropolitan-police-department mpd standing statutory-interpretation victims-rights |
Whether a person harmed by a D.C. Code offense may assert rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act against the MPD Chief |
| 20-707 |
Duane Joseph Johnson v. Eric D. Wilson, Warden |
District of Columbia |
2020-11-23 |
Denied |
appellate-counsel brady-standard brady-v-maryland due-process habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance preponderance-standard strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
Must a habeas petitioner asserting ineffective assistance of appellate counsel establish by a preponderance that counsel's omitted argument was merito… |
| 19-925 |
Kebreab Zere v. District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2020-01-24 |
Denied |
compensation constitutional-rights due-process eminent-domain fourteenth-amendment prescriptive-easement public-prescriptive-easement taking-clause takings tax-sale |
Whether the due process law of the Fourteenth Amendment was violated |
| 19-7389 |
Nicole Rena McCrea v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2020-01-24 |
Dismissed |
administrative-law administrative-remedies civil-procedure civil-rights district-of-columbia due-process eeoc-obligations employment equal-employment-opportunity-commission equal-opportunity exhaustion-of-remedies human-rights judicial-review standing statutory-interpretation |
Was the Petitioner adversely aggrieved by the actions of the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commiss… |
| 18-9375 |
Saleem Elamin v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia |
District of Columbia |
2019-05-22 |
Denied |
2nd-amendment armed-robbery civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Can the government charge the minimum sentence of 2 years for an agreed offense of carrying a firearm during a robbery? |
| 18-5264 |
Albert Jenkins, et al. v. WMC Mortgage, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2018-07-18 |
Denied |
amended-complaint amendment civil-procedure civil-rights court-of-appeals due-process fraudulent-concealment futility-of-amendment lulling-and-fraudulent-concealment oral-contract service-of-process standing statute-of-limitations |
Whether the statute of limitations was improperly applied despite fraudulent concealment |