Search

18 results for “City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.”

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Tags Question Presented
25A197 Gregory Melvin Haynes v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2025-08-19 Presumed Complete civil-procedure disqualification fraud-on-court judgment-renewal judicial-bias rule-60 Whether a district court judge's alleged bias and a party's claim of fraud on the court warrant vacating a final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil …
24M74 Thomas Ostly v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2025-03-25 Presumed Complete None
23-35 City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. v. Ivana Kirola, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Ninth Circuit 2023-07-12 Denied civil-procedure class-action injunctive-relief legal-injury standing trial-record unnamed-class-members unnamed-plaintiffs Whether a court may order injunctive relief in a case where the sole named plaintiff failed to prove she suffered any legal injury at trial but the tr…
21-1498 Norman Bartsch Herterich v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2022-05-31 Denied adjudication appellate-review constitutional-violations district-court-dismissal due-process federal-jurisdiction rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine state-court-proceedings Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars federal-district-court jurisdiction over an action merely because the action alleges Constitutional-violation…
21-768 Lil’ Man in the Boat, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2021-11-23 Denied 42-usc-1983 commerce-clause fees-and-obligations navigable-waters rivers-and-harbors-act statutory-interpretation tonnage-clause Whether an action can be maintained under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a violation of a Constitutional provision or federal statute
20-1775 Arizona, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2021-06-23 Judgment Issued administrative-law apa civil-rights immigration mootness standing Whether States with interests should be permitted to intervene to defend a rule when the United States ceases to defend
20M81 Arizona, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2021-05-07 Presumed Complete None
20-1212 Peyman Pakdel, et ux. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2021-03-03 GVR 42-usc-1983 administrative-remedies exhaustion-of-remedies finality-requirement land-use-regulation property-rights regulatory-takings takings-claim unconstitutional-conditions williamson-county Whether a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 takings claim is ripe under Williamson County's finality requirement when a city has definitively and unalterably imposed a…
20-962 United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2021-01-21 Dismissed administrative-procedure administrative-rulemaking homeland-security immigration-law immigration-nationality-act inadmissibility notice-and-comment public-charge standing statutory-interpretation Whether entities that are not subject to the public-charge ground of inadmissibility are proper parties to challenge the final rule
20-666 Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2020-11-13 Dismissed byrne-jag-program civil-rights department-of-justice federal-funding federal-grants grant-conditions immigration immigration-compliance information-sharing state-and-local-government statutory-authority statutory-interpretation Whether the Department has statutory authority to impose the notice and access conditions on grantees that accept Byrne JAG awards
19-380 Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-09-20 Denied civil-procedure-60b civil-rights discrimination disparate-treatment federal-court federal-rule-civil-procedure harassment hostile-work-environment judgment legal-error motion-for-relief ongoing-discrimination pro-se-plaintiffs retaliation Whether a federal court may grant relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) for legal error
19-379 Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-09-20 Denied civil-procedure civil-rights due-process exceptional-importance federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fraud-on-the-court fraud-upon-court judicial-misconduct ninth-circuit perjury public-employee rule-60 standing Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision imposes an erroneous and unjustifiable standard for 'Fraud Upon The Court'
19-378 Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-09-20 Denied abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure costs frcp-59(b) public-interest unclean-hands Whether the federal court abused its discretion granting costs to Respondents-Defendants despite their unclean hands and without any consideration of …
19-116 Heather Marlowe v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-07-24 Denied and whether a systemic failure to investigate rap 42-U.S.C.-§-1983 42-usc-1983 accrual civil-rights discriminatory-policy equal-protection monell Monell-claim rape-investigation statute-of-limitations When does a Monell-based equal protection claim accrue for statute of limitations purposes?
19A5 Alfred Lam, on Behalf of Himself and of Asian Pacific American Employees and Representative of the Class of the Same or Similarly Situated CCSF Employees, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-06-28 Presumed Complete None
19A6 Alfred Lam, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-06-28 Presumed Complete None
19A4 Alfred Lam, on Behalf of Himself and of Asian Pacific American Employees and Representative of the Class of the Same or Similarly Situated CCSF Employees, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-06-28 Presumed Complete None
18A1179 Heather Marlowe v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. Ninth Circuit 2019-05-15 Presumed Complete None