| 25A273 |
Thomas Bryon Cattell v. Victoria Deeks, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2025-09-09 |
Presumed Complete |
abuse-of-discretion autism continuance due-process mental-disability pro-se |
Whether a court abuses its discretion in denying a continuance or mistrial for a mentally disabled civil litigant without showing actual prejudice at … |
| 24-5912 |
David C. Lettieri v. Paul E. Bonanno, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2024-11-05 |
Denied |
absolute-immunity case-assignment due-process judicial-function jurisdictional-challenge prosecutorial-misconduct |
Whether absolute immunity shields prosecutors and judges from liability for fabricating evidence and potential jurisdictional overreach |
| 23-5163 |
Michael Joseph Formica v. Virginia |
Virginia |
2023-07-21 |
Denied |
civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence impeachment judicial-discretion standing |
Whether the Circuit Court for the City of Corvallis violated the Fourth Amendment by failing to compel the Multnomah County District Attorney's office… |
| 23-5069 |
Lola Bonitta McGee v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-07-11 |
Denied |
abuse-of-power civil-rights disability due-process employee-rights federal-employment government-accountability medical-disability retaliation workplace-discrimination workplace-harassment |
when-an-exemplary-employee-is-discriminated-against |
| 22-7748 |
Mike Webb v. James Christian Kimmel, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-06-09 |
Denied |
abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure default-judgment discretionary-power evidence-exclusion federal-rules-of-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-review motion-to-dismiss rico rico-statute |
Whether it is an abuse of discretion to exclude relevant evidence in a RICO case |
| 22-1022 |
Evan Scott Grant v. Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners, et al. |
Nevada |
2023-04-20 |
Denied |
amendment-interpretation constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process legislative-intent liberty-interest parole state-law statutory-interpretation |
Whether two separate acts passed by a state legislature concerning the same topic should be interpreted harmoniously |
| 22-5699 |
In Re Thomas George Craaybeek |
|
2022-09-27 |
Denied |
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment standing takings |
Whether the petitioner's Second Amendment rights were violated by the state's concealed carry restrictions |
| 21-450 |
Anthony Futia, Jr., et al. v. Westchester County Board of Legislators, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-09-23 |
Denied |
citizen-accountability constitutional-rights first-amendment guarantee-clause petition-clause redress standing state-constitution state-government taxpayer-standing |
Whether a State's legislative and executive employees are obligated to respond to Petitions from that State's citizen-voters for Redress of their viol… |
| 20-8420 |
Jimmie O'Neal v. Jay Christensen |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-06-25 |
Denied |
certificate-of-appealability civil-rights covid-19 covid-19-delay district-court-merits due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus judicial-discretion ninth-circuit procedural-timeliness standing |
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying a certificate of appealability based solely on the untimely filing of the petition due to … |
| 20-1626 |
Robert L. Schulz v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2021-05-21 |
Denied |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment government-response historical-practice judicial-review petition-clause right-to-petition |
Whether the forerunners to this case were fully, fairly and completely litigated |
| 20-7524 |
Mathew Ryan Byrd v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2021-03-22 |
Denied |
civil-rights constitutional-challenge criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing fourth-amendment habeas-corpus judicial-review parolee probationer search-and-seizure |
Whether the Fourth Amendment prohibits the warrantless search and seizure of a person's home and personal effects based solely on the person's status … |
| 20-6636 |
Lan Tu Trinh v. Citizen Business Banking, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-12-15 |
Denied |
banking banking-negligence civil-rights client-protection customer-protection due-process fiduciary-duty institutional-integrity institutional-sabotage procedural-safeguards unauthorized-transfer |
Should Citizens Business Banking consider the protection of its customers' money and line of credit as one of its essential responsibilities? |
| 20-5592 |
Christopher Lipsey, Jr. v. D. Goree, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-09-04 |
Denied |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process federal-review frivolous habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance malicious procedural-default standing state-court-review |
Whether the district court's dismissal of a complaint as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim constitutes a strike under 28 U.S.C. § … |
| 20-5557 |
Earl Crownhart v. STRiVE |
Tenth Circuit |
2020-09-01 |
Denied |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection jurisdiction standing takings |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred in dismissing Appellant Earl Clowbhaft's claims that the State of Ohio violated his Fift… |
| 19-8007 |
Gwendolyn Gabriel v. Merry Outlaw |
Texas |
2020-03-16 |
Denied |
civil-rights constitutional-rights discrimination due-process fraud judicial-misconduct obstruction-of-justice partnership-law perjury sexual-harassment standing |
Whether the Seventh Amendment Right to a Jury Trial protects against biased and corrupt judges |
| 18-6643 |
Sobhy Fahmy Amin Iskander v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-08 |
Denied |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-competence judicial-discretion judicial-ethics judicial-independence judicial-interpretation judicial-review legal-standards rule-of-law state-court-decision |
Whether the state court decision is contrary to federal law based on the principle of an independent, fair, and competent judiciary |