| 19-8888 |
Henry Oviedo v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority |
District of Columbia |
2020-07-02 |
Denied |
civil-rights discrimination eeoc-guidelines employment-discrimination hiring national-origin protected-class protected-status qualifications reasonable-employer title-seven workplace-discrimination |
Whether a factfinder can conclude that a reasonable employer would have hired the protected plaintiff who was significantly better qualified, but this… |
| 19-7736 |
Silvester Woods v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2020-02-21 |
Rehearing |
administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights complaint court-of-appeals damages district-court due-process emotional-distress employment intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress jurisdiction representation standing |
Whether the WMATA and ATU Local 689 presented unjustified excuses to reinstate the plaintiff and deny representation, and whether the district court a… |
| 18-1455 |
Archdiocese of Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-05-22 |
Denied |
civil-rights content-discrimination establishment-clause first-amendment free-speech government-speech public-forum religious-freedom viewpoint-discrimination |
Whether WMATA's policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amen… |
| 18A880 |
Archdiocese of Washington, Donald Cardinal Wuerl v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-02-27 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 18-1000 |
American Freedom Defense Initiative, et al. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2019-01-31 |
Denied |
civil-rights constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech government-censorship government-speech public-forum speech-restriction transit-advertising transit-authority viewpoint-discrimination |
Is the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's advertising space a public forum for Petitioner's Support Free Speech' ads such that Responden… |
| 18-7002 |
Clifton Stanley Diaz, Jr. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority |
District of Columbia |
2018-12-13 |
Denied |
appeal appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law damages default-judgment due-process employment judicial-review legal-procedure motion reinstatement remand standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in denying the plaintiff's request for monetary damages and reinstatement to his job |