| 22-211 |
Kelly Vandenberg v. University of Saint Thomas, aka University of St. Thomas (Houston) |
Fifth Circuit |
2022-09-08 |
Denied |
|
burden-of-proof civil-procedure employment-discrimination pretext pretext-standard prima-facie-case reeves-v-sanderson rule-50 rule-56 summary-judgment |
Whether the narrow Reeves exceptions apply to Rule 56 summary judgment identically as they do under Rule 50 |
| 19-1295 |
Rao S. Mandalapu v. Temple University Hospital, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2020-05-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1981 civil-rights civil-rights-act employment-discrimination pretext reeves-v-sanderson retaliation summary-judgment title-vii |
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to show discriminatory or retaliatory 'animus' against a protected category in order to prevent dismissal at the summa… |
| 19-7936 |
James Zavaglia v. Boston University School of Medicine |
First Circuit |
2020-03-10 |
Denied |
IFP |
administrative-law but-for-causation causation-standard chevron-deference civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination family-medical-leave-act fmla-interference jury-trial medical-leave motivating-factor reeves-v-sanderson retaliation standing summary-judgment |
Whether the lower courts are correct to apply Nassar to FMLA cases |
| 19-485 |
Juan Perez, et al. v. City of Sweetwater, Florida |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-10-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 city-of-canton-v-harris civil-procedure civil-rights due-process municipal-liability police-misconduct reeves-v-sanderson reeves-v-sanderson-plumbing section-1983 seventh-amendment single-occurrence-rule |
Whether the Petitioner's Seventh Amendment rights were violated |
| 18-1009 |
United States, ex rel. Muge Cody v. ManTech International Corporation |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-review circumstantial-evidence defense-contractor-whistleblower-protection-act false-claims-act federal-rule-of-civil-procedure-50(b) judgment-as-a-matter-of-law judgment-as-matter-of-law jury-verdict reeves-v-sanderson reeves-v-sanderson-plumbing rule-50 whistleblower-protection |
Whether the appellate court erred in not applying the Reeves standards in a case brought under the False Claims Act and the Defense Contractor Whistle… |